In small doses, aspirin and other NSAIDs are helpful painkillers. In fact, small doses of aspirin therapy prevents lethal heart attacks and strokes and saves thousands, possibly millions of lives annually.
If aspirin were evaluated like radiation exposure, the estimated number of deaths due to taking the recommended dose, which is 1/10 the lethal dose*, would be 1 in 10 people.
If 1 in 10 people taking aspirin died, this would be up to hundreds of millions of people annually worldwide, which is clearly not the case. Aspirin is the most widely taken painkiller worldwide, and has been for hundreds of years.
Can you imagine if every product were regulated like radiation exposure? There simply would not be any pharmaceuticals, and millions of lives would be lost or have a lower quality of life. For that matter, there would not be any water, food, or air (since overdose of anything at some level would kill you).
This method is called the linear non-threshold (LNT) method, which is the illogical method used to scare people about the health effects of radiation exposure. It assumes that there is no threshold at which something is possibly not damaging or may even be beneficial. By the same method, millions upon millions worldwide should die due to chronically living on planet earth, where our own bodies, our food (especially bananas and potatoes!), the earth (especially marble and granite), the ocean, etc. all contain radioactive decaying elements.
Our adoption of LNT has halted medical and energy progress, and cost millions of dollars. Because of our adoption of LNT, our natural environment is considered toxic when it may in fact be beneficial or even necessary for all forms of life. And, it has created lots of unnecessary fear and fodder for sensationalist media.
*Aspirin overdoses kill around 50 people per year in the USA. A
lethal dose is about 34 g, roughly 10 times the recommended dose, which is up to 4g/day. FDA Report: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/02/briefing/3882B2_02_McNeil-NSAID.htm#_Toc18761780
Search
Recent Posts
Popular Articles
-
Previously, we produced an infographic on the amount of waste produced by coal powered electricity compared to nuclear powered electricity...
-
The average coal plant burns approximately 200 coal cars a day, with 100 tons per car. This makes 73,000 cars per year, or 7,300,000 tons ...
-
Distributed energy production and storage is the ultimate form to minimize losses and peaks on the grid. In an ideal world, solar and wind ...
-
The height difference between a man and the moon is like the energy density difference between nuclear and any carbon combustion. 1)...
-
This post is in response to the "nuclear coverup" Reddit post which has been circulating the internets. Here is the chart of al...
-
Biomass is, literally, the biggest flaming crock in the energy business. He should be consoled knowing that it is a renewable source W...
-
According to studies and a documentary released by PBS, the world is currently experiencing the greatest mass extinction since the dino...
-
Physics. Those pesky laws of the universe constrain... or unleash... the amount of energy produced by an energy source. Here's a ...
-
Why Intermittency Matters, Part I: Germany's Faltering Experiment in Renewable Energy Generation by Mark Heinicke "Germ...
-
by Mark Heinicke Proponents of direct solar like to tell us how many "homes" solar installations power, as in the typical statem...

Categories
coal
CO2
natural gas
nuclear
natural radiation
wind
Japan
fossil fuels
fukushima
radiation
renewables
solar
energy
green energy
Germany
biomass
china
pollution
electricity
geothermal
ozone
particulates
subsidies
waste
CO
SO2
VOCs
ash
autos
boston
diesel
dose
ecosystems
fracturing
land use
low level
medical
oil
smog
solar panel
used fuel
water
BTEX
Chernobyl
DNA
Denmark
Gundersen
LNG
NOx
UVB
bats
biodiesel
blackout
butterfly
cancer
cesium
crude
energy consumption
ethanol
explosion
frogs
fuel
gdp
hydropower
indianapolis
jobs
kerosene
leukemia
loans
malaria
mutation
pesticides
petroleum
recycling
research
shipping
solar panel factory
solar thermal
solar voltaic
springfield
three mile island
thyroid
turbines

Interesting attempt at supporting a pro-nuclear position.
ReplyDeleteA suggestion: If you claim that you are making a logical conclusion, try to logically state how you are doing so.
You did not explain at all how the statistics of 'saves thousands, possibly millions of lives annually' and '50 deaths a year' correlate to 'if aspirin were evaluated like radiation exposure, the estimated number of deaths due to taking 1/10 the lethal dose (ie the recommended dose) would be 1 in 10 people.'
Point taken and the info about aspirin has been moved to a footnote to remove confusion for those distracted by the extra info. Otherwise, the statistics of aspirin saving lives is not supposed to correlate to the estimates of death that would occur using LNT. The positive statistics on aspirin are there to show the dramatic contrast between the negative LNT estimates to the reality that aspirin is extremely beneficial worldwide.
ReplyDelete